ShareThis Page
USDA downplays rice shortage |

USDA downplays rice shortage

| Friday, April 25, 2008 12:00 a.m

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — U.S. Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer on Thursday sought to calm the frayed nerves of consumers, saying there was no shortage of rice in the United States even as a major outlet limited sales.

He said the surge in rice prices to record highs at the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT), the world’s largest grain exchange, could be attributed, in part, to speculation about future rice shortages.

“We don’t see any evidence of the lack of availability of rice. There are no supply issues,” he said after addressing a conference on agro-terrorism in Kansas City.

“Part of the price issue is speculation because we’re so close to capacity … that if something disrupts it like the weather pattern, then you can start seeing some supply issues.

“But, today, there are no supply issues that we see in the marketplace or in the foreseeable future,” he added.

Schafer’s remarks were made one day after retail giant Wal-Mart Stores Inc.’s Sam’s Club warehouse division said it is limiting sales of several types of rice. A day earlier, Costco Wholesale Corp. said it was seeing increasing demand for items such as rice and flour as customers stock up.

Export curbs by suppliers such as Vietnam, India, Cambodia and Egypt to ensure sufficient domestic supplies have helped to push rice prices to record highs, with values in top exporter Thailand surging to $1,000 a ton.

Fears over shortages have sparked food riots in Africa and toppled the government in Haiti.

Rice prices at the CBOT rose to an all-time high above $25 per hundredweight during Asian trading hours yesterday but tumbled in Chicago trade amid signs that high prices had blunted export demand.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.