News

Vaccine vs. sex

Tribune-Review
By Tribune-Review
1 Min Read Feb. 7, 2007 | 19 years Ago
Go Ad-Free today

The article "Merck's ties to lawmakers group cloud cervical cancer issue" (Jan. 31) explained the view of some that requiring Gardasil, Merck's new vaccine against the sexually transmitted cervical cancer virus, would encourage premarital sex.

What it does not detail is the fact that this drug protects women against the strains of the human papilloma virus that are responsible for up to 70 percent of cervical cancer cases.

Although I respect the views of parents wanting to raise their children in ways they see fit, I also believe the fact that cervical cancer ranks second in cancer-related deaths of women should alarm these same parents.

I do not understand how vaccinating your child against a type of cancer that is so common among women promotes premarital sex simply because it is sexually transmitted.

Although Merck undoubtedly has a financial motive for wanting states to mandate the vaccine, it has announced plans to provide free vaccines to low-income, uninsured women worldwide.

If it follows through with its promises, its goal of eradicating cervical cancer will prove to overshadow criticisms of its lobbying efforts.

Pilar KramanShadyside

Share

About the Writers

Push Notifications

Get news alerts first, right in your browser.

Enable Notifications

Enjoy TribLIVE, Uninterrupted.

Support our journalism and get an ad-free experience on all your devices.

  • TribLIVE AdFree Monthly

    • Unlimited ad-free articles
    • Pay just $4.99 for your first month
  • TribLIVE AdFree Annually BEST VALUE

    • Unlimited ad-free articles
    • Billed annually, $49.99 for the first year
    • Save 50% on your first year
Get Ad-Free Access Now View other subscription options