Valley coach behaves disgracefully |

Valley coach behaves disgracefully

Recently, I had the misfortune to witness one of the worst examples of sportsmanship that I have ever seen. Having four boys, I have attended my share of sporting events and have never experienced what I saw and heard at the junior high football game on Sept. 24 between Freeport and Valley at Freeport.

The problems at sporting events are usually the parents, but this time the crowd watched and heard the appalling behavior from Valley’s coach, Mike Petit. My son is the quarterback for Freeport and was getting ready to set up a play when the official blew the whistle for off-sides. The official threw a flag and blew the whistle, but a Valley player tackled the quarterback, which was more of a body slam headfirst, resulting in a concussion. The official then threw another flag for roughing the passer. While my son was being attended to on the field, Mr. Petit decided, among a quiet crowd, to yell across the field to his players, “Do it again.” A couple of the players then got up and started clapping, which brought an angry Freeport crowd to its feet. This was all happening as my husband and I watched our son being carried off on a stretcher and then taken to a local hospital.

I know that football is a violent sport, and the tackling and hitting are part of the game, but ignorant and cruel remarks from a coach are not part to the game. This is a person who is supposed to be setting an example for the kids he coaches. If a player made that same comment, the coach would have reprimanded him; who reprimands the coach• The official did throw another flag for the coach’s actions, but he should have been thrown out of the stadium.

Thank God, my son is fine, but Valley needs to take a second look at who they want to represent their school and who they want to set examples for their students.

Leslie Milito, Buffalo Township

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.