Archive

ShareThis Page
Allegheny Valley mulls arming guards it hired for elementary schools | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Allegheny Valley mulls arming guards it hired for elementary schools

Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, September 18, 2018 5:09 p.m
245956weballeghenyvalleySDbuildingSH
245956weballeghenyvalleySDsignSH

Unarmed guards have been hired to provide security at Allegheny Valley School District elementary schools, but that may change in the coming weeks.

The school board hired the unarmed guards from St. Moritz Security Services Inc. for Colfax Upper Elementary in Springdale and Acmetonia Elementary School in Harmar.

But board members have mixed feelings about having officers who are not carrying weapons providing security to the two schools, which do not have dedicated officers. Instead, the district’s lone police officer, Thomas Downing, patrols those schools along with Springdale Junior/Senior High School.

“If a person comes in to shoot at staff and students, I’d sure as hell hope we’d have someone shooting back at him,” board member Larry Pollick said.

Pollick joined Stephen Puskar in voting against the move. He said he felt the board went “halfway” by hiring the unarmed guards. Puskar said his vote was from more of a “philosophical” perspective, saying he is not sure about whether to have security guards.

Asked by board member Donald Rocco what his feeling is about whether guards in the schools should be armed, Superintendent Pat Graczyk replied, “My comfort level is guns make me nervous in general but, personally, for security purposes, I would prefer to have someone with a weapon.”

Other board members also seemed to share that sentiment, questioning Joseph M. Mitchell, St. Moritz’s director of business development, about whether St. Moritz can provide armed security officers.

“We try to avoid the armed guards in the schools,” Mitchell said. “If you want armed guards, we can get them, but that’s a whole other process.”

He said the unarmed security guards operate more like local police officers who are school resource officers, developing a rapport with staff and students in order to head off potential problems. Also, they make sure that entry points to the buildings are secure and that there are not people in the building or on school property who don’t have a legitimate reason to be there.

“All our guys are trained in how to handle each situation,” Mitchell said.

The “other process” Mitchell referred to relates to the new law governing school security officers that was signed into law by Gov. Tom Wolf in June. He said St. Moritz officials still are not sure of what, if any, new requirements the law imposes in regard to armed security officers. For that reason, he said St. Moritz could not provide armed officers to the district right now even if the board wants them.

“It depends on the new rules,” Mitchell said. “If it’s not that big of a change from what we have now, then we have armed guards we can use.”

He said that if the new requirements are a major change, it could be at least three or four weeks before St. Moritz could supply armed officers.

Given that armed guards are not available now, the board voted to approve the agreement with St. Moritz. Under that agreement, the district will employ St. Moritz guards at a rate of $18 an hour and $27 an hour for working on holidays.

Graczyk said the agreement is not final solution to security at the elementary schools and that the board can revisit the issue.

Board President Antonio Pollino said all options remain on the table, including the hiring of additional school police officers.

Tom Yerace is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.