ShareThis Page
Apollo-Ridge School Board member charged with assault |
Valley News Dispatch

Apollo-Ridge School Board member charged with assault

Chuck Biedka
| Wednesday, May 30, 2018 4:15 p.m

A member of the Apollo-Ridge School Board is accused of assaulting a woman last week.Kiski Township police charged Richard Allen Fetterman, 52, of Sugar Hollow Road, Kiski, with attempted strangulation, simple assault and summary harassment for an alleged incident May 20.

According to court records, Fetterman posted $20,000 bond and is awaiting a preliminary hearing that has been moved to Rural Valley District Judge Kevin Lee McCausland’s court.

Fetterman argued with the woman and started to squeeze her neck, according to an affidavit. He allegedly picked her up and she hit the back of her head on some kitchen cabinets.

The woman, who told police Fetterman was intoxicated, said she threw kitchen chairs into his path and fled to a nearby house.

Police said they saw that her neck was red and she had a small bump on the back of her head.

Attempts to contact Fetterman were unsuccessful.

Records show Fetterman is represented by attorney Alaine Gael Generelli. She wasn’t available for comment Wednesday.

School board President Greg Primm and school district Solicitor Matthew Hoffman also didn’t return calls for comment.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4711, or via Twitter @ChuckBiedka.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.