Army Corps lifts stop-order on $350 million contract for nuclear waste cleanup |
Valley News Dispatch

Army Corps lifts stop-order on $350 million contract for nuclear waste cleanup

This aerial photo shows the former NUMEC plutonium processing facility along Route 66 in Parks Township as it looked in 1985. The nuclear waste dump is located behind the plant, which has since been torn down.

Preparations for the cleanup of a nuclear waste burial site in Parks Township can begin again after an almost 18-month delay.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers believe they have addressed issues with a bid protest and lifted a stop-order Tuesday on the $350 million federal contract to clean up the nuclear waste dump.

The bid protest, filed by bidders who didn’t win the contract to clean up the site, set back progress for the long-awaited 10-year cleanup project by a year and a half. The Government Accountability Office and the Corps so far have declined to release the names and details of those contractors.

The Corps will hold a public meeting to update residents on the project from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m., Nov. 14, at the Parks Township Volunteer Fire Department Hall, 1119 Dalmation Drive in Parks Township.

The 44-acre dump, officially known as the Shallow Land Disposal Area (SLDA), is off of Route 66 near Kiskimere Street. It was used in the 1960s by the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corp. to bury radioactive waste materials in shallow pits.

The company, under contracts with the then-Atomic Energy Commission, produced nuclear fuels for Navy submarines, power plants and other, more secret government programs.

BWX Technologies, which currently owns the site, is mandated by federal regulation to pay for at least a portion of the government-ordered cleanup, according to the Corps.

In April of 2017, the Corps awarded a $350 million remediation services contract to Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc., of Oak Ridge, Tenn., for the cleanup of radioactive waste at the dump. That contract was suspended in May last year because of the bid protest but the stop work order was lifted Tuesday.

After re-evaluating the bids, Corps officials said they found Jacobs Field Services to still be the best-suited contractor, said Brian Molloy, Corps project manager.

“Price is not what we are focused on,” he said. “We wanted the most qualified contractor to do the work and it turned out to be Jacobs the first and second time.”

In addition to re-evaluating the bids, the Corps gave the other contractors the opportunity to revise their proposals, Molloy said.

Hyde Park environmental activist Patty Ameno, said: “This is good news that the project is moving forward. We sit back and hope there are no more glitches and delays. Let’s get it up and get it out.”

The dump is scheduled to be readied for excavation and sorting the nuclear materials in mid-2020 with digging expected to begin in 2021.

“We want more than anything to make positive progress and remediate the site,” Molloy said. “We really want to get out there and start moving dirt.”

Molloy cautioned, however, that there could be future delays given the project’s size, scope and complexity.

The Parks Township cleanup is among the three most important in the country for sites with contamination from nuclear weapon production for the Cold War arms race, according to the Army Corps of Engineers, which administers the program.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary Ann at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter @MaThomas_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.