ShareThis Page
Arnold officials plan to spend $270,000 in federal money that may not come |
Valley News Dispatch

Arnold officials plan to spend $270,000 in federal money that may not come

| Thursday, September 14, 2017 6:00 p.m

Arnold officials will apply for more than $250,000 in federal grant money from the Community Development Block Grant program, even though its future is in doubt.

The move comes after council agreed Tuesday on projects for which funding should be pursued.

The Community Development Block Grant program (CDBG) is administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Money is allocated to municipalities in order to subsidize affordable housing, fund anti-poverty initiatives and complete infrastructure work.

CDBG projects must meet certain criteria — chief among them, that they are targeted to lower-income areas. According to the program website, at least 70 percent of CDBG funds must be used for projects that benefit low- and moderate-income people.

However, despite this restriction, local officials have flexibility about how and where to use the money, making the grant program popular. Municipalities like Arnold often are strapped for cash when it comes to large infrastructure projects and tackling blighted areas.

Following two public hearings on the matter, the second of which was Tuesday, Arnold officials said they hope to receive about $270,000 to fund five specific projects or obligations.

According to Solicitor David Regoli, planned are: improvements to Fifth Avenue, purchase of equipment for the fire department, acquisition and demolition of some blighted properties, loan payments and administrative and planning costs.

President Trump’s 2018 budget proposal calls for abolishing the four-decade-old program that was created under President Gerald Ford. The budget plan says that while the federal government has spent more than $150 billion on the program since its inception in 1974, it has not demonstrated results. It last was reauthorized in 1994.

But Rick Rayburg, Arnold’s community development director, said in May that losing CDBG funding would make it “extremely difficult” to get projects done.

Rayburg said then that the city was getting ready to use CDBG funds to pay for a sewer project, and that the city also has used the grant money to demolish blighted houses over the past 15 years.

Mayor Karen Peconi said Tuesday that if CDBG money were to dry up, Arnold would struggle to continue working to fight blight and to meet its loan obligations.

“It’s going to be devastating,” she said. “You see what comes out of that: It helps us fix the streets, the firemen get equipment, the loan for the demolition of all those properties.”

Last year, $3 billion in grants were awarded nationwide.

In 2016 and this year, at least 19 Alle-Kiski Valley municipalities received CDBG money in some form, though the funding provided to Westmoreland County has fallen by 31 percent in the last 10 years. Allegheny County has seen its funding drop by about 25 percent.

Matthew Medsger is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4675, or via Twitter @matthew_medsger.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.