ShareThis Page
Boy, 16, dies in Armstrong County shed fire, state police say |
Valley News Dispatch

Boy, 16, dies in Armstrong County shed fire, state police say

Chuck Biedka
| Wednesday, December 27, 2017 3:03 p.m

A 16-year-old boy died in a fire early Wednesday in South Bend, Armstrong County, authorities said.

Armstrong County Coroner Brian K. Myers identified the youth as Levi Hunter Shellhammer. State police said Levi was sleeping in a shed along Oak Hill Road and wasn’t able to get out when the shed caught fire. His parents discovered the fire and called firefighters.

State Trooper Jim Long said the shed was equipped with electricity and a refrigerator, a wood burner and furniture.

The incident was investigated by a trooper who is a deputy state fire marshal and a state police criminal investigator.

“Foul play isn’t suspected,” Trooper Eric Mauer said in a statement. He said the fire is being investigated as an accident.

Levi was identified during an autopsy that included comparison of dental records.

Myers said toxicology tests are also pending.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4711 or or via Twitter @ChuckBiedka.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.