ShareThis Page
Chief: Dog killed in fire that severely damaged Tarentum house |
Valley News Dispatch

Chief: Dog killed in fire that severely damaged Tarentum house

Mike Werries | For the Tribune-Review
Firemen attach a line to a ladder truck as a ladder is positioned toward a second floor window of a structure on fire along the 200 block of West Sixth Avenue in Tarentum.
Mike Werries | For the Tribune-Review
Firemen assemble on the street during a structure fire along the 200 block of West Sixth Avenue in Tarentum.
Mike Werries | For the Tribune-Review
Dark smoke pours from the second and third floors of a structure that is on fire along the 200 block of West Sixth Avenue in Tarentum.

A dog died in a fire that severely damaged a home late Monday on Tarentum’s West Sixth Avenue, according to Summit Hose Company Fire Chief Josh Fox.

Two people who had been sleeping inside when the fire started were not injured, Fox said.

“They were in bed and the dogs barked,” Fox said.

The American Red Cross was finding temporary housing for the people. Fox did not identify them.

The fire was reported just before midnight in the 200 block of West Sixth.

“The downstairs burned pretty bad and it extended into the second floor and third floor, where the smoke damage was pretty bad,” Fox said.

Fox said it appears the fire started near the home’s circuit breaker box. The Allegheny County Fire Marshal’s office is investigating.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected], or via Twitter @maddyczebstrib. Staff writer Dillon Carr contributed.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.