Archive

ShareThis Page
Finley the potbellied pig can stay in Leechburg — for now | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Finley the potbellied pig can stay in Leechburg — for now

Chuck Biedka
| Friday, July 20, 2018 5:24 p.m
28134gtrweekinpics13050718
Jack Fordyce | Tribune-Review
Cody and Destiney Griffith and their potbellied pig Finley are shown in a May file photo.

The pig can stay for now, but the peacock isn’t our problem.

That’s what Leechburg Council has decided regarding Finley the potbellied pig and a noisy peacock that lives in neighboring Gilpin.

Finley is allowed to stay at his owner’s Leechburg residence — even though a special ordinance covering him was vetoed in June and the council wasn’t able to overturn the veto.

The reason for Finley’s status has to do with what happened to the borough’s previous animal ordinance, officials say.

Last fall, council voted to suspend the borough’s rules regarding what animals are allowed to be kept as pets while Solicitor James Favero wrote a new ordinance to allow Finley and other household pets under specified circumstances.

Even though that new ordinance passed in May, it was vetoed by Mayor Wayne Dobos on June 19.

However, Councilman Chuck Pascal, who supports Finley and the new ordinance, said enforcement of the old ordinance remain suspended.

Favero agrees with that opinion.

That’s good news for Finley’s supporters and his owners, Cody and Destiney Griffith, of Second Avenue.

Finley is welcome in Leechburg until changes are made, said Council President Robert “Tom” Foster said.

Pascal, Foster, Nancy Bono and Christian Vaccaro voted for the ordinance that was ultimately vetoed.

The Griffiths didn’t comment.

Peacock complaints

The council and mayor also fielded complaints from a resident about the calls of a male peacock. Resident Frances Gray said it is a disturbance that, on one occasion, started at 6 a.m.

Peacocks aren’t addressed in any Leechburg ordinances and the state Game Commission won’t get involved because it isn’t a native bird, Dobos said.

Favero said the peacock is free ranging and appears to live in neighboring Gilpin.

“It isn’t penned, and as I understand no one owns it,” he said.

“We have no jurisdiction over Gilpin,” Pascal said. He said the bird is believed to be about 9 years old.

Gray isn’t satisfied and wants the noise stopped.

However, Mayor Dobos said only Gray has filed complaints about the bird.

“Probably 30 others people called and said they like it around,” Dobos said.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, cbiedka@tribweb.com or via Twitter @ChuckBiedka.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, cbiedka@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.