Groups keep pressure on Allegheny County Jail warden to comply with sex assault law |
Valley News Dispatch

Groups keep pressure on Allegheny County Jail warden to comply with sex assault law

Theresa Clift

Representatives from two Pittsburgh organizations are pressuring Allegheny County Jail Warden Orlando Harper to bring the jail into compliance with a federal law meant to prevent sexual assault and harassment following a Tribune-Review investigation.

The jail — which was sued four times last year by women who say they were sexually assaulted there — is violating at least three standards in the Prison Rape Elimination Act, the Trib reported last month.

The jail was violating the act by allowing blind spots in the camera system, failing to have an independent PREA audit performed, and failing to post public reports each year on findings of sexual misconduct and any corrective actions, the Trib found.

After the Trib interviewed Harper for the June story, the jail published its first annual report to its website .

It states there were 23 sexual misconduct claims last year, one of which was substantiated, Harper said.

It is not clear if the report satisfies the requirement in PREA. A U.S. Department of Justice official did not immediately respond to an inquiry.

According to PREA, the report must include “a comparison of the current year’s data and corrective actions with those from prior years.” The jail’s report does not include that information.

Speaking on behalf of the Pittsburgh-based FISA Foundation, of which she is a former board member, Susan Davis urged Harper to install the cameras and conduct the audit as soon as possible.

“It seems like a situation that could be quickly remediated, whether moving the women (to cells monitored by cameras) or putting the cameras up,” Davis said during a Jail Oversight Board meeting Thursday. “We believe that the audit should be conducted with all due haste and a plan be put in place to remedy any of these inefficiencies.”

“Our question is: when would there be enough cases that it would be important (to do the audit)?” Davis asked.

“Your honor, we are doing what we’re supposed to, and I’m confident that we are following PREA policy,” Harper said, addressing Allegheny County Judge David Cashman, chairman of the Jail Oversight Board.

Harper said the funding for the cameras has been secured, but they have not been installed.

Asked whether the jail has had the federally required PREA audit yet, Harper responded no.

He told the Trib in April he does not plan to have the audit done until 2019 or 2020. The first one was due by August 2016 and the next one is due by Aug. 19, 2020.

Davis also urged Harper to negotiate with Allegheny County Prison Employees Independent Union to allow only female guards to work on the female pods.

Harper responded: “As far as females being the only ones working the female pods, I have to worry about that during negotiation process next year, so that’s not on me, that’s going to be in accordance to the contract.”

Lois “Toni” McClendon, a founding member of New Voices For Reproductive Justice, echoed Davis’ comments.

“We intend to hold you all accountable to make sure what you said you were going to do actually has been done,” McClendon said.

Cashman said during the meeting that the jail passed its state inspection and was the “highest rated jail in the commonwealth.”

That inspection focuses on the facility’s physical structure and does not check for sexual misconduct, said Amy Worden, a state Corrections Department spokeswoman.

Harper declined to comment to a Trib reporter after the meeting.

Full-body scanner coming

Harper announced the jail was buying a full-body scanner to detect contraband inside inmates’ bodies, which would eliminate a controversial policy of strip-searching all inmates after visits with counselors.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669, [email protected] or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.