Harrison pays for emergency demolition after fire |
Valley News Dispatch

Harrison pays for emergency demolition after fire

Row houses along Linden Street in the Natrona section of Harrison had to be razed after fire tore through them on Sept. 14.

Harrison Commissioners approved a $3,800 payment to Haas Excavation and Demolition for their work last Saturday after a structure fire affected residences at 10, 12, 14 and 16 Linden Avenue in the township’s Natrona section.

Township code enforcement officer Lindsay Frazer will know sometime Friday, Sept. 21 if asbestos remediation is needed.

Commissioners thanked Haas for its quick response and Pioneer Hose of Brackenridge for being first on the scene.

Commissioner Gary Lilly of Natrona asked that the township consider a donation to Pioneer since they are frequently answering a Natrona call before the three Harrison fire companies arrive. Natrona’s volunteer fire company disbanded more than a decade ago.

Commissioner Charles Dizard thought a monetary “good-faith acknowledgement” would be in order.

Township officials will research the legality of a fire company donation for an organization outside the township.

Officials are concerned that ATI’s plans to use the railroad tracks more frequently than in the past to transfer steel between the Brackenridge and Natrona works might cause a problem for the three existing Harrison companies to reach Natrona if one or both of the railroad crossings are blocked.

George Guido is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.