ShareThis Page
Missing Ohio man found near Tarentum |
Valley News Dispatch

Missing Ohio man found near Tarentum

Paul Peirce
| Wednesday, September 13, 2017 5:26 a.m
Albert Simmons

An 86-year-old Ohio man with dementia is expected to be reunited with his family today after state troopers from the Kittanning station located him driving his pickup truck along Route 28 near Tarentum.

Albert Simmons of Medina was reported missing by family members who feared he became lost and disoriented while driving to a family gathering Tuesday, according to the Medina County Sheriff’s Office.

Simmons was supposed to meet them at Chippewa Lake but never showed up. He left his home in his pickup truck about 10:30 a.m. Tuesday, according to the sheriff’s office.

About 12:30 a.m. today, troopers patrolling Route 28 pulled over his gray 2007 Ford F-150 truck near Tarentum after he nearly sideswiped a patrol car, Cpl. Michael Markey said.

“Upon contacting the operator, this trooper observed the operater to be confused, unsure of his surroundings and current events,” Markey said in a release.

While checking the vehicle’s registration, Markey discovered that Simmons was reported missing in Medina County.

Medics took Simmons to Allegheny Valley Hospital in Harrison for observation.

Troopers contacted his family, who will travel about 145 miles to the hospital to pick him up.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.