ShareThis Page
New Kensington-Arnold School District recalls 15 furloughed teachers |
Valley News Dispatch

New Kensington-Arnold School District recalls 15 furloughed teachers

Matthew Medsger
| Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:55 p.m

The New Kensington-Arnold School Board have reinstated 15 furloughed teachers and more could be returning next month.

Those 15 recalled Thursday night represent less than half of the 37 teachers given notice that they might lose their jobs at the end of the school year.

But Superintendent John Pallone said a further round of recalls would most likely be announced during the board’s next meeting on July 27. “This is the first round; we’ll be calling back some more next month,” Pallone said. “We’re just waiting to hear from a few teachers that are on leave.”

Pallone couldn’t say how many of the remaining furloughed teachers would be recalled, but he said not to expect to see all of the teachers return for the coming school year.

Teachers union President Connie Vita praised the furlough recalls and thanked the board for doing so.

“I’m glad they called these teachers back; it will make for a better summer for them,” she said. “But I hope they all get called back.”

The board previously blamed the furloughs on declining student enrollment, the consolidation project that closed two schools three years ago and program cuts.

History repeats itself

Historically, most furloughed teachers have been called back.

The board has followed a similar pattern for the past two school years, announcing in 2016 that 21 teachers would be furloughed. Ultimately, at least 18 were called back.

In 2015, 24 teachers were cut before the board brought back all but three before the end of summer. The same thing happened in 2011.

More than 20 teachers were on the furlough list in 2014, but all were recalled.

Shrinking population, tax base

The district’s student population has been steadily declining. According to information provided by Pallone, enrollment at the end of 2004 was 2,520. This year, 1,958 students were enrolled.

According to Jeff McVey, director of administrative services, falling district home values have resulted in lower tax revenue.

Additionally, the cost of pension contributions has steadily increased in the past 10 years, up to $1.6 million this school year from $350,000 in 2007-08.

Voting to reinstate the teachers were board President Bob Pallone, Vice President Pat Petit, members Robert Fusia, Liney Glenn, Ron Balla Sr., Kathleen Clark and Kristin O’Sullivan.

Eric Doutt and Ellyse Williams were absent.

No tax hike

The board also voted unanimously to keep the current property tax rate for another school year.

The district’s real estate tax rate will remain at 83.27 for 2017-18.

Balla, formerly a New Kensington councilman, praised the board’s efforts at keeping the tax rate steady.

“I served the city council for 16 years and never voted for a tax increase, and I’m extremely proud to vote again for this school district not to have a tax increase,” he said.

Keeping the tax rate the same means a house in the New Kensington-Arnold School District with an assessed value of $15,000 will continue to incur an annual tax bill of about $1,249.

Matthew Medsger is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4675 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.