ShareThis Page
Police close investigation of latest Sheldon Park shooting |
Valley News Dispatch

Police close investigation of latest Sheldon Park shooting


Allegheny County Housing Authority police said they have closed their investigation into a shooting Monday morning at Harrison’s Sheldon Park housing complex because the victim is not cooperating with authorities.

“There’s not much we can do. This woman (who was shot) is not coming clean,” authority police Chief Mike Vogel said Tuesday. “We can’t substantiate anything without her cooperation.”

Vogel said he does not think the incident poses a threat to community.

He believes the shooting stemmed from a “domestic situation” in which someone she knows shot her or she accidentally shot herself. The woman has not been identified.

“I don’t see anybody needing to be alarmed or concerned in the community. This is an isolated incident between her and whoever,” Vogel said. “I don’t see any threat being posed to the community based on what had happened.”

Harrison police learned of the shooting around 7 a.m. Monday when the woman arrived at Allegheny Valley Hospital. Police said a friend drove her there. The woman was then taken to an unspecified Pittsburgh hospital, where she was treated and released, Vogel said.

Vogel said the woman was shot once in a bedroom at her apartment on Park Drive. He could not say what type of weapon was used.

A representative of the Allegheny County Police, which assisted with the investigation, did not respond to request for comment Tuesday.

Monday’s shooting came a week after Satomi Finch, 41, and her 16-year-old daughter Lilly Finch were shot by a neighbor as they returned home to their Sheldon Park unit on Municipal Drive. The shooter, Eddie Layne, 48, committed suicide.

Brian Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.