ShareThis Page
Police: Threat to ‘shoot up’ East Franklin school not credible |
Valley News Dispatch

Police: Threat to ‘shoot up’ East Franklin school not credible

Mary Ann Thomas
| Thursday, March 15, 2018 9:18 a.m
Courtesy of the Armstrong School District
West Hills Intermediate School

Pennsylvania State Police in Kittanning have deemed a report of a threat to “shoot up” an East Franklin Township school as not credible.

On Tuesday around 5:30 p.m., state police were contacted about a potential threat at the West Hills Intermediate School, which is part of the Armstrong County School District.

A caller reported that a known juvenile allegedly planned to “shoot up” the school and threatened other forms of violence on an unspecified date, according to Trooper. Patrick Carlson and Cpl. Chris Robbins.

“Based on information learned in the investigation, there is no credible threat to the safety of the school and students,” Carlson and Robbins said in a press release.

The investigation continues.

The school did not immediately return calls for a comment.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4691, or via Twitter @MaThomas_Trib.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.