Trip to Taiwan proposed for Kiski Area students |
Valley News Dispatch

Trip to Taiwan proposed for Kiski Area students


Some Kiski Area High School students could be headed to the Far East early next summer.

High school Chinese teacher Kaity Chou presented a plan to the school board to take an 11-day trip to Taiwan next June 9 through 18.

A minimum of 15 students are needed to make the trip and the cost is $3,899 per person.

Chou has taken students on two trips previously to her native land.

The school board plans to vote on the request Monday.

“It’s nice to see a teacher show great passion and vigor, that’s really nice to know,” school board member Ronald Coleman said.

The trip would be highlighted by a visit to the National Palace Museum, which includes 5,000-year-old Chinese artifacts taken from the mainland during the revolution of the late 1940s.

Students also would take a trip to a tea farm and interact with junior high students in Sanxia, who are the most proficient in English.

“This is a place with a fascinating culture,” said Kiski Area graduate Nolan Pepka in a video presentation. “I returned there as part of a two-week study group while a Purdue student. The trip showed me that there is so much the world has to offer.”

George Guido is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.