Valley High School students dismissed early because of rising Little Pucketa Creek |
Valley News Dispatch

Valley High School students dismissed early because of rising Little Pucketa Creek

Students at Valley Junior/Senior High School in New Kensington were dismissed early Monday as a precaution because ongoing steady rain caused Little Pucketa Creek to rise in front of the school.

“It’s at its peak right now,” Superintendent John Pallone said. “It’s probably the highest it’s been in the last 10 years.”

The district sent out an e-mail notice alerting people of the early dismissal shortly after 10:15 a.m. Monday. It said the bus company had been notified, and the district was looking to have all students dismissed as close to 10:30 a.m. as possible.

Pallone said the district decided to dismiss students and staff early in the event the creek should overflow.

Students and staff were dismissed by 11:30 a.m. at the latest and all athletic events were canceled.

“There was no imminent harm or fear. We took a prophylactic approach to ensure that in case the banks of the creek were in fact breached that we were already ahead of the game,” Pallone said.

A flood control basin was added years ago.

“Since that project, the creek has been pretty much controllable, and we haven’t had to dismiss early … or cancel school because of the creek rising,” Pallone said.

“But with the rain that we’ve had these last couple of days, the water level of the creek is at its banks now,” Pallone said. “Once it starts creeping into the parking lot it creates a safety hazard. We erred on the side of caution and dismissed and closed the campus for (Monday).”

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected], or via Twitter @maddyczebstrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.