Archive

ShareThis Page
Washington Twp. officials dealing with runoff issues to comply with state water pollution rules | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Washington Twp. officials dealing with runoff issues to comply with state water pollution rules

Tribune-Review
| Sunday, September 16, 2018 8:06 p.m.
223325WEBrain

Silt running into streams is the biggest challenge Washington Township officials face concerning a state-mandated anti-pollution program.

That’s what Amber Yon of Senate Engineering, the township’s engineers, told residents Thursday.

Yon, who specializes in the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Program, briefed residents at the township supervisors meeting as part of the program’s public education requirement.

The purpose of the program is to eliminate pollution caused by chemicals or sediment carried by stormwater runoff from sources such as construction sites and pavement where oil or chemical spills have occurred, into streams and rivers.

It is administered by the state Department of Environmental Protection as part of the federal Clean Water Act.

She said smaller streams in the township’s three watersheds, Beaver Run, Pine Run and Pucketa Creek, have been affected.

“Our streams are impaired,” Yon said. She said Poke Run, Pine Run and Beaver Run are impaired by ‘siltation.’

She said that the township, in tracing sources of pollution, have found none from chemicals — only silt caused by erosion making its way into the streams.

The township has submitted a plan to the state and federal governments aimed at eliminating the problem, which DEP has accepted, according to Yon.

“The township has selected several areas where we will go out and stabilize the stream banks,” she said.

One resident asked Yon about the practice of residents and businesses such as utilities using chemicals to get rid of weeds and vegetation along streams. He asked if the streams would not be better served by leaving the vegetation grow along the banks.

Yon agreed.

“We certainly wouldn’t recommend destabilizing the stream banks by using weed killers,” she said.

However, she said the township has no say over what utilities do within their rights of way.

Supervisors Chairman Rich Gardner said the state and federal governments have not provided money to help with the pollution abatement projects, leaving it to the communities to cover the cost.

That can run into hundreds of thousands of dollars.

He said the township has responded by creating a capital fund specifically for MS4 projects. Gardner said this is the first year for the fund which was financed using about $30,000 from the impact fees from gas well drilling that the township received last year.

He said more money will be added to the fund, probably from the same source, when next year’s budget is compiled in the next few months.

Tom Yerace is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.