ShareThis Page
Valley residents with Middle Eastern heritage didn’t fear backlash |

Valley residents with Middle Eastern heritage didn’t fear backlash

Timothy Karan
| Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:00 a.m

A huge American flag adorns a wall outside of Eazer’s Restaurant and Deli in New Kensington.

Following Sept. 11, it was practically mandatory for businesses to promote solidarity and unity through banners and signs, but the symbol hanging outside of the small, homestyle diner is especially meaningful.

Owners Georgette Corbin and her husband are Lebanese.

“We are still American,” Corbin said. “We are proud of our heritage but this is our home.”

Although there are distinct differences between Lebanese and other Middle Eastern ethnicities who weren’t affiliated with terrorist activities, in a post-traumatized America, it was hard to predict if a backlash might come against all who resemble the perpetrators in any way.

“We kept hearing that Middle Eastern people in America would be hurt,” Corbin said. “Someone told my son to shave his beard because he looked like the terrorists. But nobody ever did anything to us. We were never afraid.”

Similar sentiments were echoed by Jay Bandara, owner of the Exxon Gas Station in Tarentum, who is of Indian descent.

In a Sept. 11 interview, immediately following the attacks, he said that he did not foresee any problems.

Since that day the soft luminescent glow of the store sign outside has read “God Bless America” and not a corner of the property isn’t occupied by a small American flag.

Arvind Reddy, Bandara’s cousin who is a clerk at the store, assures that Bandara’s foresight has been accurate and that the store has not had any problems concerning the workers’ ethnicity following the attacks.

“We have been here long enough that most of our customers realize we are Indian,” he said. “Nobody has been prejudiced toward us.”

Reddy is qualified to speak about the effects of the struggling economy. He relocated to the Valley after he was one of 50,000 employees laid off last year by Ford Motor Company. He has a master’s and MBA in computer science.

Educated in New York City and present in O’Hare Airport in Chicago at the moment of the attacks, he maintains a very optimistic view of the country he has always been fascinated with.

“I still believe America is the greatest country in the world,” he said, panting between frantic customers demanding cigarettes and returning “funny-tasting Slushees.”

“It’s very sad, but America is now seeing what India has been experiencing for 20 years now,” he said.

Corbin agreed that the expansion of terror is an all too familiar scenario.

“These are the people that have ruined much of the world where I am from,” Corbin said. “They have no value for human life anymore, and it is very sad to see so many innocent people hurt by what they do.”

Reddy and Corbin emphasized that most of the residents of the Valley have been very considerate and open-minded toward them in the past year, and they feel confident that the future will hold promise.

When asked if they feel that life will go on as usual after today’s one-year anniversary, both answered without a trace of hesitation that it will.

“We know in our hearts everything will be OK,” Corbin said. “We hope that it is true for everyone.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.