Valley School of Ligonier wins tax assessment appeal |

Valley School of Ligonier wins tax assessment appeal

The Valley School of Ligonier has won a tax assessment appeal for an East Main Street property on the Diamond in Ligonier.

The Westmoreland County Tax Assessment Appeals Board agreed with appraiser Gary Hayden’s testimony that the fair market value of the building, which the school leases to Citizens Bank and Janney Montgomery Scott, should be $1.35 million.

Previously, the implied market value of the property, based on an assessed value of $374,410 multiplied by the Westmoreland County Common Level Ratio of 5.18 percent was $1,939,443.80.

The new assessed value, which will take effect in 2015, is $260,550.

The property taxes will decrease by a total of almost $14,000 in 2015 for all taxing bodies, according to chief assessor William S. Ferraro.

Under the new value, Westmoreland County will receive about $5,470, Ligonier Borough will receive $6,123 and Ligonier Valley School District will garner about $19,930.

Ferraro said those figures would change if millage rates change.

Under the old value, the county received almost $7,860, with almost $8,800 going to the borough and about $28,640 going to the school district.

“As far as the school is concerned, it’s a great opportunity for them, and it’s a nice way to preserve the Diamond,” said attorney Mark Sorice, who represented Valley School of Ligonier in the appeal.

Ligonier Borough solicitor George Welty and Ligonier Valley School District solicitor Dennis Rafferty declined to comment.

Nicole Chynoweth is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2862 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.