ShareThis Page
Vandergrift police pact heads to court |

Vandergrift police pact heads to court

Jonathan Szish
| Wednesday, April 16, 2003 12:00 a.m

The attorney representing Vandergrift police said he will file a court motion this week to try to force borough council members to accept a three-year police contract that they have refused to endorse.

Council members have refused to sign the contract the past three months, a delay which drew top-ranking members of the local Fraternal Order of Police lodge to Monday’s council meeting. They asked council to move on the issue.

But Councilman Taylor “BeBe” Troiano said council is content to go by what the courts say.

Vandergrift police officers have worked without a contract for almost 16 months. It has been the longest contract dispute in the borough in recent memory.

Unlike teachers, state law forbids police and professional firefighters from going on strike.

Police and council had been negotiating the contract, but they couldn’t agree on a residency requirement. Both sides sent the residency issue to arbitration.

In January, an arbitrator ruled that police officers could live within five miles of town. This was a request of the police officers and is a break with tradition in Vandergrift, where officers always have had to live in town.

The arbitrator’s decision is binding.

“For some reason they (council) just will not sign the contract,” said Tom Ceraso, the attorney representing the police. “That’s where we are, which is somewhat absurd.”

The day of arbitration in January, there was an agreement on all other points, such as 4 percent raises and health care, according to lawyers from both sides.

Council members see it differently.

“Council was under the impression this entire contract was to be arbitrated,” Troiano said. “If anything went to arbitration, then the whole contract was to be opened.”

Ceraso said no council members were present for the arbitration hearing. Troiano said that’s because most council members have jobs and the hearing was during the day.

The president of Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 39, of which Vandergrift police officers are members, decried the situation and predicted that council will lose in court “without question.”

“The guys (police) are sitting there a year-and-a-half without a raise,” said union President Leroy Anthony. “It’s just a shame what they’re doing.”

Troiano said it isn’t necessarily a losing battle in court.

“That’s his opinion and he may be right. I’ve got to try to present the taxpayers with the best police protection I can,” Troiano said.

The last police contract, also a three-year deal, expired Dec. 31, 2001. It gave police average annual raises of 5 percent.

The police force has eight full-time and five part-time officers.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.