ShareThis Page
Vast info available |

Vast info available

| Friday, August 24, 2012 9:00 p.m

Luis Fábregas’ column “We lack checkups of area’s specialists” (Aug. 11 and about the lack of doctor and hospital performance information in Pennsylvania left out important things that patients ought to know.

While the column made a valid point about the limited amount of data on doctors in some specialties, it neglected to mention the vast amount of information that is available to help consumers make informed medical decisions. In fact, Pennsylvanians have access to more information about their hospitals and doctors than most other Americans.

Notably, the story said that the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4) has not produced physician-specific reports consistently, but actually, PHC4 has issued cardiac reports on a regular basis since the mid-1990s. Those reports include information regarding mortality, length of hospital stays, readmissions for complications and infections, and case volumes for hospitals and cardiac surgeons.

Through omission, the column implies that there is little medical outcome data available in Pennsylvania. Here again, it ignores material offered by PHC4. Most especially, that includes performance reports on every hospital in the state, covering about 50 different conditions and treatments. All reports are readily available at the agency website,

While we continue our efforts to provide more transparent and useful information to Pennsylvania patients, we also want people to be aware of the help already out there.

Joe Martin


The writer is executive director of the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.