ShareThis Page
Vet booted from diner over service dog gets apology |

Vet booted from diner over service dog gets apology

| Wednesday, August 28, 2013 9:27 p.m

OXFORD, Mass. — A diner owner has apologized for throwing out a military veteran because he brought in his service dog.

Russell Ireland, owner of Big I’s in Oxford, told Air Force veteran James Glaser and his dog, Jack, to leave the diner on Saturday. Ireland said at the time that he didn’t really believe Jack was a service dog because Glaser allowed people to pet and feed it, unlike the service dogs he has seen with other customers.

Ireland swore and told him to get his “fake service dog” out of the diner, Glaser said.

Glaser, who served in Iraq, says the dog helps him deal with post-traumatic stress disorder by smelling chemicals released by the stressed body before an attack and taking action to distract the owner.

“I used to get mad, yell, break things,” Glaser said, explaining his PTSD.

“Many times, he’s (woken) me up from night terrors,” Glaser told news station WFXT. “And then, during the day, when I get upset and mad or something scares me or whatever, he comes up and paws my chest.”

Ireland says he now has a better understanding of the situation because veterans have come in or called and explained to him how an animal can help veterans cope with PTSD.

“I’m changing my mind and my stance,” he said.

The incident drew criticism on social media and harassing phone calls, Ireland said.

Glaser, who suggested a boycott of the restaurant, said Tuesday he hadn’t heard from Ireland directly and still planned a rally at Big I’s on Saturday to draw attention to the issue.

It is illegal for public businesses — such as restaurants, hotels, stores, cabs, and sports facilities — to restrict access for service animals.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.