Vets not worth the money? |

Vets not worth the money?

The elections are over and now it’s back to business with Congress having many issues in need of attention.

The VA scandal is still a priority. Although the VA has made some progress toward veterans’ care and benefits improvements, it is not completely thought out.

Our Congress needs transparency, bipartisanship and accountability. Theodore Roosevelt said, “A man who is good enough to shed his blood for his country is good enough to be given a square deal afterwards.” We veterans deserve a square deal.

Thousands of veterans are sick with post-traumatic stress disorder or other severe illnesses. Vietnam War veterans continue to combat illnesses associated with the herbicide Agent Orange.

House Bill HR-543, which would provide up to $9 billion over 10 years for the care of veterans, is stalled in the Veterans Affairs Committee. We give billions of dollars to foreign countries, some of which hate us, yet money for veterans continues to be delayed.

What is wrong with this picture? It goes to show veterans are low priority.

Call your members of Congress and demand they pass HR-543.

John J. Bury

Media, Pa.

The writer is retired from the Navy and a Vietnam veteran.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.