ShareThis Page
Victim of fatal fire identified |

Victim of fatal fire identified

| Friday, December 15, 2006 12:00 a.m

Fayette County Coroner Dr. Phillip Reilly has identified the victim killed in an early morning fire Thursday in Dawson as Robert Howard, 36.

The fire, which started at 3:16 a.m., consumed his modular home.

Howard, of 409 River Road, was pronounced dead at the scene at 5:34 a.m., apparently the result of carbon monoxide poisoning complicated by extensive burns, Reilly said.

An autopsy was being performed in Pittsburgh. Preliminary results should be known sometime today, Reilly said.

Capt. Billy Colbert Jr., of the Dawson Volunteer Fire Department, said it appeared the victim was the only person in the house at the time of the blaze.

“The fire was fully involved when we arrived,” said Lt. Tommy Begonia Jr., of the Dawson fire company.

It took firefighters from Dawson, Everson, DL&V and Scottdale more than 45 minutes to get the blaze under control. “It was a pretty difficult fire,” Colbert said.

There were no reports of injuries to firefighters.

Reilly said Howard’s identity was confirmed by tattoos. The coroner said a scan of Howard’s remains revealed nothing in the way of blunt-force trauma or other injuries that would have contributed to his death.

There is still no known cause or origin of the fire.

Trooper Brian Burden, of the state police at Uniontown and Belle Vernon barracks, said the fire marshal at the Belle Vernon barracks is investigating.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.