ShareThis Page
Victory in defense of freedom |

Victory in defense of freedom

| Sunday, November 15, 2009 12:00 a.m

The history of the United States is one of victories in defense of freedom.

These moments include great military victories in the Revolutionary and Civil wars and World War II. Other victories include the march over Selma Bridge during the Civil Rights movement in 1965 and the rebellion aboard Flight 93 on Sept. 11, 2001.

Many nations have histories of kings, conquerors and dominating rulers. Our history of successfully defending our liberty and constitutional democracy, even when things looked bleak, is unique. And one aspect of it is particularly striking.

Time and again average Americans have stood up under pressure to protect us. It is well documented that one advantage the American military had over both its German and Japanese opponents during World War II was a culture that enabled junior officers and troops to step to the plate and take command when needed.

When the captain was wounded, the lieutenant could always take command. When the lieutenant was shot, the sergeant knew what to do, and when the sergeant was gone, the corporal or private would pursue the mission. This ability to assume leadership and responsibility is a tribute to American military training but, more importantly, it is a characteristic of American culture.

To understand how deeply embedded this individual ability to stand up is in our culture, remember the story of Todd Beamer and the other 9/11 heroes on Flight 93. Did these Americans just sit there like sheep waiting for the slaughter• No, they used cell phones and air phones to discover what was happening to our country. When they realized that they were on the fourth plane to be hijacked and were heading toward Washington, D.C., they attacked the hijackers and came so close to re-taking the plane that the hijackers were forced to crash it into the ground screaming “Allahu akbar.”

Nine days ago at Fort Hood, Texas, the world once again witnessed these strong characteristics. This time, police Sgt. Kimberly Munley, a former U.S. Army soldier and mother of two children, responded to a report of a shooting.

Munley and her partner, Sgt. Mark Todd, were on the scene within minutes. Without backup, they confronted Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, who is accused of killing 13 Americans and wounding 30 others.

Hasan shot Munley three times. Despite her wounds, Munley returned fire, hitting Hasan and ending his bloody rampage.

Americans are proud of Munley for what the commander of Fort Hood called her “amazing and aggressive performance.”

Yes, Munley is an amazing heroine. But our enemies should realize that there are millions more Americans just like her who stand ready to answer duty’s call.

Todd Beamer and Kimberly Munley stand as reminders that Americans will continue to win the critical battles to preserve our freedom.

Glen Meakem was the founder, chairman and CEO of FreeMarkets Inc. He is co-founder and managing director of Meakem Becker Venture Capital in Pittsburgh.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.