ShareThis Page
Violent drunken driving crash claims the lives of former Pittsburgh couple |

Violent drunken driving crash claims the lives of former Pittsburgh couple

A former Pittsburgh couple died in a violent drunken driving collision Thursday in Florida, police said.

Douglas Simpson, 64, and Christina Simpson, 53, were returning to their St. Petersburg home from a Thanksgiving celebration when a vehicle driven by Anthony A. Neeley, 31, of Seminole, Fla., smashed into their car, police said. The Simpsons died instantly.

Neeley was driving at more than 100 mph just before the collision, police said, and had hit a vehicle nearby.

Police charged Neeley with drunken driving manslaughter, leaving the scene of a crash, driving without insurance and driving with a license for business purposes only. Police said Neeley’s blood alcohol level exceeded the legal limit of 0.08 percent.

Christina Simpson’s brother, Emanuel J. Skarvelis of Severna Park, Md., said Saturday that the couple had married in July 1997. They lived in the area of Pittsburgh’s North Shore, Skarvelis said, until they moved to Florida in July 2002.

“Doug loved to be on or near the water,” Skarvelis said.

The Simpsons met through their common love of running, Skarvelis said, and ran several Pittsburgh Marathons together. In Florida, Doug Simpson worked at a local resort, while Christina worked at All Children’s Hospital.

Christina Simpson was a graduate of Keystone Oaks High School in the late 1970s, her brother said, and went to Community College of Allegheny County.

“They loved Florida, but my sister said many times her heart was in Pittsburgh,” Skarvelis said.

He added that the couple visited him in October after delaying the trip several times.

“They finally made it,” Skarvelis said. “It was like they wanted to come by and say farewell.”

Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.