ShareThis Page
Vote for growth |

Vote for growth

Letter To The Editor
| Monday, May 28, 2012 12:30 a.m

I read The Associated Press news story “G-8 embraces growth, jobs at Camp David summit” (May 20 and about the G-8 leaders’ agreement to focus on economic growth policies. It is obvious that none of those leaders have a clue about how to do that. When they talk about “job growth” and “investments in R&D,” they are talking about more wealth-destroying government spending and counterproductive regulatory growth.

Their idea of job growth is analogous to hiring wrecking crews to knock down perfectly good buildings, roads and bridges. And adding more federal bureaucratic employees is analogous to hiring people to build fences, dig moats and put up barbed wire to keep productive business people from getting in there and creating truly productive jobs.

But sadly, in one sense, it’s not really their fault. It is our fault, because we keep electing them. We need to stop voting for the career academics, the college professors and the lifelong politicians. It is time for us to vote for the productive, commonsense business people, who really know how to solve problems and get things done.

This is our responsibility, and we need to do our job in November.

Richard J. Krauland


Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.