Vote likely on 14-acre project in Cranberry |

Vote likely on 14-acre project in Cranberry

Cranberry officials are expected to vote Thursday on a plan for 14 acres along Route 228 ready or not.

Cranberry planners and representatives of Youngstown, Ohio-based developer Thomas Petrarca have been squabbling over which traffic improvements will be necessary to accommodate the development.

Dan Santoro, Cranberry’s assistant manager, said the developer should be required to build dual left-turn lanes on Route 228 eastbound to access the parcel, but Ray Caruso, traffic engineer for the plan, has said a single left-turn lane will be sufficient.

Bob Blumling, the attorney representing Petrarca, said he would not grant the township another extension to consider the traffic issues.

So it seems likely supervisors will discuss and vote on the plan at their meeting at 7 p.m. Thursday in the township building, 2525 Rochester Road.

The development could include a big-box retailer and two smaller businesses, according to preliminary drawings.

Blumling has asked supervisors for several variances for the project on a plot of land that includes the 5-acre Pittsburgh North Campground and nine-and-a-half acres adjoining it. Among the requests are reducing the number of sidewalks that would have to be built within the plan.

Cranberry resident Art Neal said officials should require the sidewalks because people would use them, and the developer is just trying to cut costs.

Blumling has said the areas for sidewalks are unsafe and impractical.

Blumling also wants Cranberry to reduce its green-space requirement from 40 percent of the development to 30 percent. He said that because the developer is giving up 1.8 acres to be used for roads it would be hard to leave 40 percent of the parcel untouched and natural.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.