Archive

W.Va. man accused in thefts has links to gang of killers in Pittsburgh area | TribLIVE.com
News

W.Va. man accused in thefts has links to gang of killers in Pittsburgh area

A West Virginia man arrested Thursday in connection with a burglary ring that looted dozens of Pennsylvania businesses has links to a notorious group of killers in the Pittsburgh area.

James “Sonny” Watson, 67, was part of a nefarious gang linked to a highly publicized string of murders in the late 1970s that featured Robert “Codfish” Bricker of the North Side and William “Eggy” Prosdocimo of Greenfield. An Allegheny County jury convicted Watson of third-degree murder in 1982 for the shooting death of Norman McGregor of West Mifflin on his front porch.

“I think McGregor was the muscle man for some poker machines,” said retired Pittsburgh police Detective Skip Butler. “Sonny Watson was hiding under the bed when I arrested him.”

Watson was paroled in 2001 after serving 19 years in Pennsylvania, and then shipped to West Virginia where he stayed until his release in September 2005, prison records indicate. Officials could not be reached to explain his stint in the West Virginia prison.

District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. this week announced charges against Watson and four others for the burglary ring that spanned through Allegheny, Butler and Westmoreland counties. Charleston, W.Va., police arrested Watson yesterday, said Zappala spokesman Mike Manko.

Watson faces six charges stemming from two of the burglaries. Accused ring leader Timothy Sunday, 47, of Etna is charged with 63 counts from 25 burglaries.

Butler, along with Allegheny County Sheriff Bill Mullen and the late Detective Terry O’Leary, investigated several of the slayings connected to Bricker’s group.

“They called him the Codfish because he was so cold,” Mullen said. “He was connected to a lot of murders. They were from the Greenfield-Hazelwood area, and a lot of those guys ran together.”

Watson cut off his penis while he was in a West Virginia prison in the 1970s. He was shipped to a mental hospital for treatment and later escaped, Mullen and Butler said.

Watson then joined Bricker’s group of thugs, where he wanted to be a “big shot,” said Joseph Steele, 73, who prosecuted Watson’s case in 1982. Watson could have faced the death penalty if convicted of first-degree murder.

“They paid him some money to kill McGregor. It was a contract killing. I don’t think it was that much money. He was doing it to prove his bravado,” Steele said.

A fellow member of Bricker’s group implicated Watson in the shooting of a man mistakenly believed to be McGregor, said attorney Michael Healey, who defended Watson.

Healey said five defendants, including Watson and Bricker, were charged in connection with McGregor’s killing. Bricker died in prison in 2000. Prosdocimo is serving a life sentence.

“There was a whole series of contract killings. Watson was one of those guy implicated,” Healey said. “He was kind of a character. I got along with him.”

Bricker and Prosdocimo were convicted in the 1979 killing of Thomas Sacco of Dormont, said former Assistant District Attorney Jim Lees, who tried Bricker’s case.

“They were all part of drug distribution rings — young punks in the drug trade,” Lees said. “I think Watson was proud of that killing.”


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.