ShareThis Page
Wall collapses during repair |

Wall collapses during repair

Jeremy Boren
| Saturday, July 22, 2006 12:00 p.m

Pittsburgh building inspectors said the collapse of a brick wall on Lawrenceville’s main thoroughfare happened as a contractor worked to repair a gap in the brick.

William Pontier, owner of the Starr Discount convenience store at 4115 Butler St. in Lawrenceville, was not required to have a building permit for the repair work being performed Thursday from a scaffold on his building. The building has no code violations, Pittsburgh Bureau of Building Inspection Chief Ron Graziano said.

Pontier had hired a private contractor to fix a 2- to 3-inch gap that had formed in the brick facade of the building.

“Evidently, there was a bow in the wall,” Graziano said.

A neighboring business owner recently pointed out the problem to Pontier, Graziano said.

Workers were removing loose bricks and, shortly after they left for the day, the wall collapsed, littering the street and sidewalk with bricks.

No one was hurt and no other buildings were damaged, Graziano said. He didn’t know what caused the collapse. Graziano did not plan to fine or cite Pontier.

The city has condemned Pontier’s three-story building, which contains a convenience store on the first floor, and four vacant apartment units on the floors above.

Pontier must hire a structural engineer to inspect the building and issue a report on what must be done to secure the rest of the brick wall within five days.

Two adjacent buildings were evacuated when the wall collapsed. One of those buildings, where a hair salon operates, must remain closed at least until the engineer’s report is ready. No restrictions were placed on the second building.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.