Archive

ShareThis Page
Washington Township man’s death in fiery crash investigated | TribLIVE.com
News

Washington Township man’s death in fiery crash investigated

State police and the Indiana County coroner are trying to determine why a Washington Township man died in a fiery crash just after 3:30 a.m. Friday.

William Albert Jenkins Sr., 79, of the 5000 block of Greensburg Road, was alone in a pickup on Route 422 in Pine Township when the Ford he was driving left the roadway and hit a tree near Deer Lane, state police said.

Police said the crash trapped Jenkins and the truck burst into flames.

Several passers-by pulled over and ran into the wooded area to help.

“They tried to use fire extinguishers, but they couldn’t reach him,” Coroner Mike Baker said.

Jenkins was pronounced dead at about 4:30 p.m. from blunt force trauma and burns, Baker said.

Toxicology reports are pending but an autopsy won’t be done.

Baker said Jenkins may have fallen asleep at the wheel, but the wreck’s cause is unknown. State police said it remains under investigation.

“His relatives don’t know why he would be there other than visiting someone,” Baker said.

Baker said the Findlay C. Wylie Funeral Home in Penn Hills is in charge of arrangements.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.