ShareThis Page
Washington’s SEIU contract not finalized |

Washington’s SEIU contract not finalized

Stacy Wolford
| Friday, April 5, 2002 12:00 a.m

WASHINGTON, Pa. – The Washington County Commis-sioners were expected to sign off on a union contract Thursday, but there are still a few snags that need to be ironed out.

Washington County Com-mission Chairman John P. Bevec said the four-year pact with the Service Employees Union International Local 585 will likely be signed by all three commissioners within the next several days.

A question over three language issues in the contract is what caused the delay in the final approval, Bevec said.

Those issues include descriptions of union employee sick days, shift differential and second shift start times.

Bevec said they commissioners met with union officials Wednesday, at which time the questions were raised.

Both sides agreed to call upon the mediator who was involved with contract negotiations.

“We’re going to ask the mediator his recollection of those issues and we’ll agree to that,” Bevec said.

The SEIU rank and file on March 20 narrowly approved the new contract by a vote of 181 to 169. SEIU Local 585 includes 435 county workers in nursing, 911, maintenance, aging services and custodial positions.

The union’s previous contract expired Dec. 31.

Bevec said both sides will likely talk with the mediator next week and “hopefully” sign off on the contract at the next public commissioners’ meeting on April 18.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.