ShareThis Page
WCCC’s hiring debate: Transparency, please |

WCCC’s hiring debate: Transparency, please

| Friday, April 25, 2008 12:00 a.m

Allegiance to an embattled community college president over a flap about who does the school’s hiring doesn’t trump the obligation of college trustees to the public.

And if in this unfolding controversy the concepts of transparency and checks and balances in hiring at a publicly funded institution are somehow revolutionary — as some college officials suggest — then let the revolution begin.

Westmoreland County commissioners fired the first shot with a proposal this month to give Westmoreland County Community College’s trustees final say in hiring, thereby stripping the responsibility from college President Steven Ender. It’s estimated Mr. Ender has filled about 600 jobs over the last three years.

The commissioners’ plan, however, prompted concerns over the potential for political funny business, as the college’s 15 trustees are appointed by the county’s leaders. And that thorny issue has become the pin to the grenade that’s held by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education. College officials say the commission can pull WCCC’s accreditation if any future hiring policy is construed as political.

Rather than explore a compromise, board of trustees chairwoman Gail Malloy on Wednesday proposed turning over all hiring responsibility to Ender. (Trustees currently ratify the hiring of salaried workers.)

There remains one nettlesome problem: WCCC is a public-funded $31.6 million operation that employees 800 people and receives $4 million from Westmoreland County. That earns the public, at the minimum, a vantage point into the college’s hiring. And that’s not an infringement on this or any other community college president.

It is the public’s right.

A substantiative discussion of the hiring policy is warranted. We suggest the trustees begin one with the Middle States Commission in the interest of both the college and the pubic that helps foot the bill.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.