We used to call it ‘theft’ |

We used to call it ‘theft’

As surely as Christmas songs and commercials began flooding the broadcast airwaves last week, so too did the flood of news releases from U.S. senators and representatives begin clogging reporters’ mail bins.

They carried exciting tales of fabulous riches redirected home, the fruits of a laborious effort to bag the beast featuring the most succulent of public meat known to man — pork, cut from the taxpayer shoulder.

Never mind that, as The Heritage Foundation calculates, the cost of government now stands at more than $20,000 per household per year. And never mind that the federal budget deficit has zoomed past $400 billion, the 108th Congress cut the pork thick and ladled the gravy heavy.

There’s $450,000 for the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum in Cooperstown, N.Y. What, Major League Baseball didn’t get enough money when it molested taxpayers in its host cities for billions of dollars over the last decade for new ballparks?

The Clark County, Nev., school district got $25,000 to develop a curriculum to study mariachi music. Mariachi is said to encompass the essence of Mexico and its people. So go buy some tequila and bid on some old Baja Marimba Band records on eBay, for crying out loud.

The Lady B Ranch in California got a $150,000 public subsidy for its “Therapeutic Horseback Riding Program.” Indeed, the goals of this effort appear to be worthy — a unique attempt to help disabled children and adults overcome their handicaps. But is it really the role of the federal government to “improve the … self-esteem of every rider”?

Nearly $100,000 is going to the Patrick Henry Community College in Martinsville, Va., to train students in the motorsports industry. This is a government function• And, gee, shouldn’t organizations like NASCAR and the Indy Racing League (IRL) be responsible for developing future talent?

The National Association of Promoting Success is getting $100,000. Given that I could not find any references to this group following an exhaustive Web search (other than the announcement of the appropriation), I’ll turn ornery and wonder aloud if it’s a shell group that actually covers the cost of politicians’ news releases touting the pork they’ve secured.

The good folks of Walla Walla, Wash., are getting a quarter-of-a-million dollars to “study” surplus federal property. What’s to study• If it’s “surplus,” sell it to somebody who’ll turn into something productive — remember, the federal government produces nothing — and get it back on the local tax rolls.

A cool $3 million is going to the Center for Grape Genetics in Geneva, N.Y. Another $3 million is going to the Grape Genomics Research Center in Davis, Calif. Hey, I’m all for better grapes that will produce a better Merlot. But I’d rather pay for my share of research and development at the checkout counter instead of being mugged by Washington, thank you.

Bakersfield, Calif.’s, retail district is going to get a nice facade and sidewalk improvement, thanks to $280,000 in public money. And after it’s all done, there will be some federally funded “street furniture” to take it all in. If you find in your copy of the Constitution the warrant for this kind of expenditure, let me know — I’ve got a porch swing that needs replacing.

We’re all going to help those nice folks in Ottawa, Kan., and Prescott, Alaska, build new municipal swimming pools; $100,000 and $72,750, respectively (but hardly respectfully) is being picked from your pockets.

Also in Alaska, we’ll be paying $150,000 for something called “Fishing Rationalization Research.” Is there a psychologist in the house?

The Waynesboro, Miss., police department will be relocated, thanks to another $300,000 extracted from your purse. What, the FBI’s going to have an office upstairs?

Taxpayers will underwrite, to the toon (for it is car toonish ) of $1.5 million, the cost of transporting “naturally chilled water” from Lake Ontario to Lake Onondaga in Syracuse, N.Y. It’s all about cooling buildings. What, we now have the right to life, liberty and taxpayer-subsidized air conditioning•

Public radio station KENW in Portales, N.M., will get $500,000 for new equipment. That, I guess, will enable it to continue to broadcast such fine programs as “Gregorian Chant With and Without Organ” and the liberaled-up rants of Garrison Keillor’s “A Prairie Home Companion,” disguised as contemporary, whimsical folktales.

All of this Brobdingnagian wealth redistribution is, as defined more than 400 years ago by 16th-century English composer John Northbrooke, “liberality” incarnate — “the giving away of other men’s goods.”

We used to call this “theft.” Now we call it “government.” There’s no way to prosecute these thieves. And if we try to starve these purveyors of fine, excised pork, taxpayers would be the ones who end up in jail.

Sweet. For the thieves, that is.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.