ShareThis Page
Webster’s play inspired hours after saying goodbye to dad |

Webster’s play inspired hours after saying goodbye to dad

| Saturday, September 28, 2002 12:00 a.m

Garrett Webster wore his father’s number on his jersey, had his spirit in his heart and felt his presence on the first play of the fourth quarter of a game played only hours after Mike Webster was eulogized.

Garrett Webster, a 6-foot-8, 330-pound senior defensive tackle, whirled Ambridge quarterback Riley Wallace around and slammed him to the muddy field for a sack and a 5-yard loss.

It was a relatively inconsequential play in the Tigers’ 42-8 victory over Ambridge on Friday night at Moon Stadium, but one that came across as a revelation: His dad, Hall of Fame center Mike Webster, was gone for good.

“It just hit me that I’m not going to have somebody at the door to say, ‘Good sack, buddy,’ ” said Garrett, who stood idle on the sidelines afterward, his chest heaving and his helmet cast downward. “I was just shook up a little.”

Garrett, wearing No. 52 like his father did for the Super Steelers, buried his father Friday morning and played football in his dad’s honor that night. He was the third WPIAL football player to lose a parent and play in a game in the same the week this season, and the most famous.

Hopewell senior defensive back Matt McCrory lost his mother, Tammy, 43, to cancer on Aug. 29. The next night, Matt played in the Vikings’ 34-15 win over North Hills. Bethel Park senior lineman D.J. Garfolo lost his father, John, 54, to a brain stroke Sept. 8, the Sunday before the Black Hawks’ 30-12 win over Seneca Valley.

“My dad would never let him not play for any reason,” Brooke Webster, 25, of Lodi, Wis., said of her brother. “Garrett has been amazing through all of this. I’m really proud of him.”

The Moon community rallied around the Websters. The school’s booster club paid for food for the family. Captains Bill Ashburn, Rick Derenda and A.Q. Shipley accompanied Moon coach Mark Capuano and his staff to Joseph M. Somma Funeral Home earlier Friday for funeral services.

Garrett, wearing a black-and-gold patch with No. 52 on his left shoulder and words memorializing his father on his taped wrists, led the team on pre-game laps around the field. He also was one of the game’s captains.

“He’s been preparing himself for the fame,” said Fred Shaheen, a close friend of Mike Webster’s. “Mike would never sign No. 52 on autographs, even when people would request it. He said, ‘That’s reserved for my son.’ ”

At 7:17 p.m., with the Moon football team still in the locker room, the public address announcer asked for a moment of silence in honor of Mike Webster as the Coraopolis VFW presented the colors before the national anthem.

“It’s helped a lot, actually,” Brooke Webster said of Garrett’s playing on the day of his dad’s funeral. “We’re just trying to do what our dad would want. To have someone carry our dad’s name in football is wonderful.”

Steelers Hall of Fame running back Franco Harris came to the game and stood on the sidelines as a show of support to his fallen teammate and his family. He was impressed with Garrett’s decision to play.

“You think about it – his lost his dad – and to come out and play is amazing,” Harris said. “I’m sure his dad is looking down and is happy to see his son playing football. That’s what he would have wanted.”

Garrett echoed those words afterward while undressing from his muddy uniform and reflecting on the conflicting emotions of losing his dad and winning a game on the same day.

“I said my last goodbyes to my dad,” Garrett said. “It was a celebration, but it was emotional.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.