ShareThis Page
Wecht watch, March 19 |

Wecht watch, March 19

| Wednesday, March 19, 2008 12:00 a.m

Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, a former Allegheny County coroner, is accused of using his public office for private gain and of defrauding clients of his private pathology consulting business.

12:59 p.m.

After more than eight hours of deliberations, the jury in Dr. Cyril H. Wecht’s federal public corruption trial finally had a request: copies of the actual laws he is charged with violating.

It took nearly an hour before the request was finally denied.

Prosecutors originally objected to the request, with Wecht’s lawyers stating the jurors should be given the statutes — which contained provisions not applicable to this case as well as penalty provisions.

“If that’s what they want,” defense attorney Jerry McDevitt said.

U.S. District Judge Arthur J. Schwab was surprised by the positions.

“Tactically, I thought the positions would be reversed,” Schwab said, before leaving the courtroom to make a decision.

Before he returned, Wecht’s lawyers and prosecutors agreed to not give jurors the statutes.

They provided this suggested reply: “You will have to follow all of the instructions of the court given to you, including on those statutes.”

Schwab had already crafted his own response to deny the request.

“Since some of the requested statutes contain provisions not related to his case and since the jury instructions provide the necessary applicable law tailored to this case, the court respectfully declines your request,” Schwab suggested.

Wecht’s lawyers had an issue with a small portion of Schwab’s suggestion.

“I think we can correct your language, if you’re agreeable,” McDevitt said as the judge looked on with a “you-must-be-kidding-me” expression on his face.

McDevitt suggested dropping “tailored to this case.” Schwab finally agreed after prosecutors said they would accept either response.

If nothing more, the jury was able to eat its lunch in peace. Their food arrived shortly before the question was submitted around 11:15 a.m., and they received the written denial at 12:24 p.m.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.