ShareThis Page
Week 7: Steelers Key Matchup |

Week 7: Steelers Key Matchup

| Sunday, October 25, 2009 12:00 a.m

Steelers run defense vs. Minnesota RB Adrian Peterson


The Steelers have allowed more than 100 yards rushing to a team only once this season and that was to the Detroit Lions, but the Steelers will get its toughest test when they take on Adrian Peterson and the Minnesota Vikings. The Steelers defense historically has been good against the run. It hasn’t allowed a 100-yard rusher in 24 regular-season games and have only gave up three over the past 78 games. Two weeks ago against San Diego, the Steelers run defense allowed only 16 yards rushing on eight attempts. It was the lowest rushing total against the Steelers since New England managed only five yards rushing in a 34-20 Steelers victory in 2004.


The reigning league rushing champ has run for more than 100 yards in 18 of his 36 career games, and he will provide a stern challenge for the Steelers’ front seven. Peterson is averaging 5.2 yards per carry and 103 yards per game over his two-plus year career. He has scored 29 rushing touchdowns. Peterson again leads the league in rushing with 618 yards. The Vikings aren’t afraid to continue to hand Peterson the ball and take the pressure off quarterback Brett Favre. Peterson is averages 20 carries per game. Only Jim Brown’s 104.3 yards per game ranks higher than Peterson’s 103.5.


The Steelers don’t allow opposing running backs to gain 100 yards. They usually don’t allow running backs even to get close. Cincinnati’s Cedric Benson came the closest this year by gaining 76 yards in a Week 3 game. There was concern that the run defense would struggle with the loss of defensive end Aaron Smith to a shoulder injury, but it gave up only 91 last week to the Browns. Veterans Travis Kirschke and Nick Eason filled in admirably for Smith, and Casey Hampton and Brett Keisel played well along the defensive line to make up for Smith’s loss.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.