West Allegheny softball rallies past Thomas Jefferson in PIAA semifinals |

West Allegheny softball rallies past Thomas Jefferson in PIAA semifinals

Don Rebel | Trib HSSN
West Allegheny players celebrate with pitcher Ashley Seamon after defeating Thomas Jefferson in the PIAA Class 5A semifinals June 12, 2018, at Peterswood Park.

Trailing by a run in the top of the sixth inning, Thomas Jefferson hit what felt like a lethal three-run home run that left two-time WPIAL Class 5A champion West Allegheny wobbling for a standing 8-count, but did not knock them out.

The Indians rallied for four runs in their half of the sixth to beat the Jaguars for the second time in two weeks. The come-from-behind, 7-5 victory lifted West Allegheny into its first PIAA softball championship game.

“Incredibly emotional,” West Allegheny’s teary-eyed coach, Mindi McFate, said. “The seniors we have on this team and in this program have meant so much to where this program is at right now. This is my 15th year coaching, and I’ve been successful, but the way these kids carry themselves on and off the field, that’s what builds a program. They play hard, they play together and they are all so incredibly humble.”

The game was scoreless when the Indians’ Taylor Goldstrohm launched a two-run homer to score Angela Costa to make it 2-0.

Both teams plated a run in the fourth. Thomas Jefferson scored on an RBI single by Liz Brock that scored Alanna Cleary, who led off the inning with a double. West Allegheny tallied on a run-scoring single by Costa that plated courtesy runner Alyssa Goldstrohm.

The Jaguars closed the gap to 3-2 in the fifth on another RBI single by Brock that scored courtesy runner Alyssa Natter.

That set the stage for a wild sixth inning at Peterswood Park.

With Mckenzie Zang at second and Paige Truax at first with one out, Haleigh Karcher picked a good time for her first home run of the season to put the Jaguars up 5-3. TJ pitcher Bella Bucy then doubled, but the Indians turned an inning-ending double play on a ground ball to shortstop Taylor Cummings, who retired the batter at first, then Indians first baseman Jillian Weber gunned it to third to retire courtesy runner Natter.

That play sparked the district champs as an always-loud dugout turned it up several decibels.

Megan Pollinger led off with a walk and went to third when Amy Nolte’s sacrifice bunt was thrown away.

Up came Costa who was 3 for 3. She thought she was hit by a pinch by Bucy, but despite a painful hand, the umpire ordered her back to the batter’s box. She then delivered a run-scoring single to right that put runners on the corners with nobody out in a 5-4 game.

After Goldstrohm was intentionally walked to load the bases, back-to-back sacrifice flies by Cummings and MacKenzie Partyka put the Indians ahead for good. Savannah Lewis’ single drove home an insurance run for West Allegheny that capped off the four-run rally.

Ashley Seamon nailed down the victory for the Indians in the seventh when with one on and two outs, she got Zang to fly out to Costa.

“Angela’s a tough kid, she’s a smart kid, she’s a competitor and she’s only a freshman,” McFate said. “She’s battled all year long, and she is a very good player.”

Thomas Jefferson (15-7) won eight of its final 10 games, including five in the district and state postseason, but those two losses were against the Indians in the WPIAL finals and PIAA semifinals.

West Allegheny (23-1) will now face District 3 runner-up Lampeter-Strasburg in the Class 5A state title game at 4 p.m. Thursday at Nittany Lions Park at Penn State.

This Indians softball team will try to become the school’s second girls varsity team to win a state championship. The only West Allegheny girls team to win a PIAA crown was the volleyball team in 2006.

Don Rebel is a TribLive High School Sports Network broadcaster and staff writer. Reach him at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.