ShareThis Page
West Deer considering community pool |

West Deer considering community pool

| Thursday, March 27, 2003 12:00 a.m

INDIANA TOWNSHIP: West Deer officials are interested in joining the township supervisors’ plunge into a communtiy swimming pool project.

Patrick Kennedy, chairman of the West Deer Parks and Recreation Board, said in the three years he’s been on the board, the most frequent question he gets is why doesn’t the township build a swimming pool.

It seems to be the top of “a number of ideas that would benefit the most people in the township,” Kennedy said.

When he read about Indiana Township’s public hearing on their pool study, he pitched the idea of a joint project to the West Deer supervisors. They supported the exploration of a cooperative project.

“We’re not nearly as far as you are,” Kennedy said to the Indiana Township supervisors Tuesday night.

Indiana Township Manager Daniel Anderson agreed, and said the final draft of the feasibility study is expected soon. However, Anderson said the largest concern about a pool was not the operational costs. The year-to-year costs could be paid by user fees according to the study. The problem is the construction costs.

Working cooperatively might enable the townships to qualify for state andfederal grants to help with that, Anderson said.

“They want the biggest bang for their bucks,” he said.

Kennedy offered to solve another problem, a location. He suggested the former Nike missile site along Route 910. The site, about 12-acres, has a little piece in Indiana Township. Presently a senior citizens center is located there. Also, the International Football Association has soccer fields at the site.

“There is nothing permanent there,” Kennedy said.

He said the federal government requires the land be used for recreation. Apool would encompass about five acres Anderson said.

The manager said it would be a minimal cost for Pashek Associates, the firm that compiled Indiana’s pool study, to revamp the monetary figures factoring in another municipality.

Anderson said other northern-rim communities such as Richland or Frazer also could be brought in to broaden the base.

The plan is not without problems. The missile silos are probably filled withwater and are slated to be removed by the Army Corps of Engineers in 2008.

“This might be a chance to move this up,” Kennedy said.

“It’s worthwhile doing some cooperative exploration,” Indiana Township MayorGeorge Dull said.

Kennedy said he had run the idea by West Deer Township Manager Shelia Hanlonand the supervisors, who agreed it could be feasible.

“Money is the key,” Kennedy said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.