ShareThis Page
West Mifflin businessman avoids jail on tax evasion |

West Mifflin businessman avoids jail on tax evasion

A West Mifflin businessman on Tuesday avoided a jail sentence as punishment for his role in a scheme to underpay his taxes.

Frank Veltri, 59, pleaded guilty in August to conspiracy and tax evasion. He and his partner, John R. Miller, 59, of South Park own or collect license fees from about 20 Italian Village Pizza restaurants.

U.S. District Judge Gustave Diamond sentenced Veltri to four years of probation with the first year on home confinement, the same sentence he gave Miller in January. He fined Veltri $60,000, $15,000 more than Miller, because Veltri had a more active role and kept more money in the cash-skimming scheme.

The judge ordered Veltri to perform 200 hours of community service, which wasn’t part of Miller’s sentence.

Veltri underpaid by about $187,000. Miller underpaid by about $93,000, court records show.

Veltri has already paid the Internal Revenue Service the taxes he owed plus penalties and interest, said his lawyer, Stephen Stallings.

Stallings said his client is an otherwise law-abiding citizen who goes out of his way to help others. Veltri has come to realize the seriousness of his crime and has become “hyper-compliant” on tax laws as a result, Stallings said.

“I didn’t recognize the magnitude of this, growing up,” Veltri told the judge. “I do now and it’s never going to happen again.”

The crime was puzzling because Veltri had enough money to pay all the taxes and penalties and wasn’t living beyond his means, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Stephen Kaufman.

The government asked the judge to sentence Veltri to 12 to 18 months in prison to deter other owners of predominately cash businesses from under-reporting their income, Kaufman said.

Diamond said the financial hit plus the damage to Veltri’s reputation and the embarrassment to his family will do that.

Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.