ShareThis Page
West Mifflin’s Williamson, Coleman highlight invitational |

West Mifflin’s Williamson, Coleman highlight invitational

| Saturday, April 16, 2005 12:00 a.m

West Mifflin sprinters Montel Williamson and Brandon Coleman, Central Catholic long jumper Eric Charity and Connellsville middle-distance runner Kenny King shared a large spotlight Friday night at Latrobe’s Memorial Stadium in the third annual Greater Latrobe Wildcat Track and Field Invitational.

Williamson (100 meters) and Coleman (200) ran on the winning 4×100- and 4×400-meter relay teams and Justin Moore won the triple jump to help West Mifflin win the team title with 83 points.

Central Catholic placed second with 71.5 points in the 16-team event, followed by Latrobe 64, Hempfield 57.5 and Baldwin 52.

“It was a pretty normal race,” Williamson said of his victory in the 100. “I can do better and I want to improve my times. I have work harder in practice.”

Coleman dominated the field in the 200. He crossed the finish line 10 meters in front of Latrobe’s Nathan Cebula.

Charity, a junior, won the long jump with a leap of 21 feet, 2 1/2 inches, and ran the opening leg of the winning 4×800-meter relay team. He won easily, but he noted that the competition was tough in the long jump.

“Everyone had a chance to win,” Charity said. “All it took was one big jump. All I tried to do was my best. I’m looking to reach 22 feet in the next few meets.”

Charity didn’t get a chance to compete in the WPIAL individual championships last year because Central Catholic had three good senior jumpers.

“It didn’t bother me,” Charity said. “It just made me work harder this year.”

King, the returning WPIAL and PIAA Class AAA 800-meter champion, set meet records by winning the 800 and 1,600.

King said good weather was a big reason that he ran well.

“It’s the best I’ve felt all season,” King said. “I had a lot of fun running.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.