ShareThis Page
West Point softball rallies to remain unbeaten |

West Point softball rallies to remain unbeaten

Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
| Sunday, August 7, 2011 12:00 a.m

The West Point Junior girls softball team improved to 3-0 in the Little League Eastern Regional in West Haven, Conn, by rallying to defeat Milford, Del., 5-1.

The trio of Nicole Adisey, Amber Reeping and Shelby Noel combined to throw a one-hitter. Reeping was the winning pitcher, working three scoreless, hitless innings in relief of Adisey, who left trailing, 1-0.

Kellie Hutchinson continued her hot hitting, going 2 for 3 with two RBI. She had a two-run double in a three-run fourth inning.

Adisey, who went 3 for 3, drove in the first run of the inning with a single.

“We were a little off,” West Point manager Tom Appleby said. “We didn’t hit like we have. It wasn’t one of our most impressive games. But our pitchers did another nice job, and falling behind didn’t seem to faze the girls.”

West Point added two insurance runs in the sixth inning on a throwing error when Hutchinson and Julie Fiedor were attempting a double steal.

West Point plays another doubleheader Sunday. It will battle Westerly National, R.I., at 10:30 a.m., and then play the only other remaining unbeaten team in the tournament, West Haven, Conn. at 2:30 p.m.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.