ShareThis Page
West Shamokin golf team off to a 7-1 start |

West Shamokin golf team off to a 7-1 start

| Tuesday, September 12, 2006 12:00 a.m

West Shamokin’s golf team has been living up to the hype.

Prior to the start of the season, Kittanning coach Bud Stanley and Freeport coach Dave Panach each said that West Shamokin was going to be one of the toughest teams to beat, and, so far, that’s been the case.

West Shamokin is 7-1, with its only loss coming against Burrell at Hill Crest Country Club. This week promises to be challenging for the Wolves, as they travel to Ford City today and then Freeport on Thursday.

Along with Burrell, Freeport, which lost all of its starters in the offseason, has emerged as one of West Shamokin’s biggest challenges. The Yellowjackets lost to the Wolves, 213 -211, on the road at White Oak Golf Course earlier this season.

“A lot of credit has to be given to (West Shamokin coach) Dick Crawford,” Panach said. “He’s really risen that team from the bottom. He really put the time in, and with two golf courses now by the school, he had 20 kids come out. He’s trying to put together a program.”

Crawford is happy with the way his team has been playing, but he’s far from satisfied.

“We’re capable of playing better,” he said. “I’d like to see us break 200.”

West Shamokin came close to that goal against Apollo Ridge. The Wolves shot a 204, and, had Matt Schrader’s 39 counted, they would have posted a 199. However, before the match, Schrader qualified as West Shamokin’s No. 8 golfer. He would have needed to be in the top six.

Crawford described his team as being fairly even between the top six to 10 players.

“I think we’re capable of doing just about anything,” Crawford said. “But we have to do it on the course. You don’t play the games on paper.”

West Shamokin’s players have been heeding Crawford’s words. Over the summer, some of them visited the home courses of several of their opponents so they could better acquaint themselves with how to play on the road.

One of those players was Austin Baum, a senior who Crawford said is the most improved golfer on the team. Baum was the medalist in two of West Shamokin’s last four matches, shooting a 38 against Elderton and Apollo Ridge.

Baum said he worked on his short game a lot over the summer.

“I could always hit the ball far, but I had to work on the short game,” Baum said. “I kept going to the course and playing. Coach (Crawford) showed me putting drills.”

Perhaps some of West Shamokin’s opponents should have done the same and practiced at White Oak Golf Course, where the Wolves are unbeaten. Panach and Ford City coach Joe Sgricca said that West Shamokin enjoys a home-course advantage.

“They have a lot of experienced players,” Sgricca said. “And their home course is tough. It has small greens and teams aren’t used to them.”

Regardless of how tough White Oak is to play, though, the Wolves’ experienced players are the reason why they have jumped out to a strong start. Baum is just one of several Wolves who has the ability to be medalist. West Shamokin’s other top golfers include Keifer O’Neill, who is averaging a 39.5, Schrader, Nick Byerly, Cody Dinger and Ryan Markin.

“They have four solid players that anyone can be medalist, I feel,” Panach said. “But Keifer is the main guy.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.