ShareThis Page
West Virginia pollution kills fish, mussels in tributary of the Mon |

West Virginia pollution kills fish, mussels in tributary of the Mon

The Tribune-Review
| Friday, September 18, 2009 12:00 a.m

Two Pennsylvania agencies are monitoring a Monongahela tributary after pollution from West Virginia killed at least 16 species of freshwater mussels and at least 18 species of fish earlier this month.

More than 30 miles of Dunkard Creek have been impacted by a discharge of total dissolved solids — which refers to all elements in water at their molecular level and can include carbonates, chlorides, sulfates, nitrates, sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium — originating from West Virginia.

The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and the Fish and Boat Commission are working with the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to address the fish kill, first detected on Sept. 1 and reported to the DEP on Sept. 8.

The main stem of Dunkard Creek, in Pennsylvania, is designated a warm water fishery. It meanders for 38 miles along the southwest border of Pennsylvania before its confluence with the Monongahela River downstream of Point Marion in Fayette County.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.