ShareThis Page
West Virginia-Syracuse scouting report |

West Virginia-Syracuse scouting report

The Tribune-Review
| Saturday, February 8, 2003 12:00 a.m

Syracuse (15-3, 6-2 Big East) at West Virginia (12-7, 3-4)

  • Game info: 4 p.m., at WVU Coliseum (14,000), Morgantown, W.Va.

  • On the air: WTRF-TV, WVAQ-FM (101.9) and the Mountaineer Sports Network

  • Coaches: Syracuse — Jim Boeheim (27th year at Syracuse, 638-224); West Virginia — John Beilein (first year at West Virginia, 12-7; 25th year overall, 459-265)

  • Probable starters: Syracuse — Hakim Warrick, F, 6-8, So.; Carmelo Anthony, F, 6-8, Fr.; Craig Forth, C, 7-0, So.; Gerry McNamara, G, 6-2, Fr.; Kueth Duany, G, 6-6, Sr; West Virginia — Tyrone Sally, F, 6-7, So.; Drew Schifino, F, 6-3, So.; Kevin Pittsnogle, C, 6-10, Fr.; Johannes Herber, G, 6-6, Fr.; Jarmon Durisseau-Collins, G, 5-10, Fr

  • The skinny: The Mountaineers are coming off a 91-83 victory at Villanova. Syracuse is coming off victories against Pitt and Georgetown. Drew Schifino (Penn Hills) scored 31 points against Villanova.

  • Key matchup: The battle between Schifino and Syracuse freshman forward Carmelo Anthony. Both are averaging more than 20 points per game.

  • Worth noting: Syracuse leads the all-time series 23-15. … Syracuse won both meetings last season. … WVU’s last victory against the Orangemen was during the 2000-2001 season.

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.