ShareThis Page
West Virginia tops St. John’s at home |

West Virginia tops St. John’s at home

| Thursday, January 29, 2009 12:00 a.m

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — Da’Sean Butler scored 21 points to lead West Virginia to a 75-52 win over St. John’s on Wednesday night.

The Mountaineers (15-5, 4-3 Big East Conference) used a stifling defensive effort in the first half to build a 36-20 halftime lead. WVU scored 13 points off of 13 Red Storm turnovers and limited St. John’s to just 34 percent shooting from the field in the opening half.

West Virginia pushed its lead to 31 points on a 3-pointer with 5:38 remaining in the second half. St. John’s was never able to trim the deficit to less than 16 points.

Alex Ruoff added 17 for the Mountaineers, while Devin Ebanks chipped in 10.

Paris Horne led St. John’s (11-9, 2-6) with 16 points, while Schenley graduate D.J. Kennedy netted 14.


St. Bonaventure 61, Duquesne 55 — Katelyn Murray scored 23 points and Dana Mitchell added 16 to lead St. Bonaventure (15-5, 4-1) over Duquesne (11-9, 1-4) in an Atlantic 10 Conference game at Palumbo Center. The Bonnies, who shot 46 percent overall and 50 percent (6 of 12) from 3-point range, led at halftime, 30-26. Alex Gensler led Duquesne with 11 points. Kristi Little added 10 for the Dukes, who lost their third in a row and fifth in the past six games.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.