ShareThis Page
West Virginia-Virginia Tech scouting report |

West Virginia-Virginia Tech scouting report

| Saturday, March 8, 2003 12:00 a.m

West Virginia (13-14, Big East 4-11) vs. Virginia Tech (11-17, Big East 4-11)

  • Game info: 2 p.m., at WVU Coliseum (14,000), Morgantown, W.Va.

  • On the air: Television: FOXP; Radio: WVAQ-FM (101.9) and the Mountaineer Sports Network

  • Coaches: Virginia Tech — Ricky Stokes (fourth year at Virginia Tech, 45-69). West Virginia — John Beilein (first year at WVU, 13-14; 25th year, 460-272).

  • Probable starters: Virginia Tech — Bryant Matthews, F, 6-7, Jr.; Dimari Thompson, F, 6-9, So.; Terry Taylor, C, 6-8, Sr.; Eric Branhan, G, 6-0, Sr.; Brian Chase, G, 5-10, Sr. West Virginia — Tyrone Sally, F, 6-7, So.; Drew Schifino, F, 6-3, So.; Kevin Pittsnogle, C, 6-10, Fr.; Johannes Herber, G, 6-6, Fr.; Jarmon Durisseau-Collins, G, 5-10, Fr.

  • The skinny: The Mountaineers are coming off a 69-67 loss to Georgetown. Virginia Tech is coming off a 79-71 loss to Miami.

  • Key matchup: The Mountaineers need a big game from Pittsnogle and Sally because the Hokies are led by their frontline of Matthews (17.5 points per game) and Taylor (15.5).

  • Worth noting: West Virginia leads the all-time series 45-27. … Schifino (Penn Hills) averages 20.4 points per game. He scored 21 points against Georgetown. … Pittsnogle averages 11.7 and Sally 8.7.

    is a former freelancer.

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.