Western Pa. judges one step from filling vacancies on federal court |

Western Pa. judges one step from filling vacancies on federal court

Judge Marilyn Jean Horan, Butler County Court of Common Pleas.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter

Two Western Pennsylvania jurists, including one from Butler County, are a step away from filling vacancies on the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday approved the nominations of Marilyn Jean Horan, a Butler County Common Pleas Court judge since 1996, and Susan Paradise Baxter, a Latrobe native and U.S. magistrate judge in the Western District in Erie since 1995.

President Obama nominated both judges in July, and Pennsylvania’s U.S. Sens. Bob Casey and Pat Toomey endorsed them during judiciary committee hearings in December.

The full Senate still must approve them.

Obama also nominated Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Robert John Colville to a seat in the Western District. The committee has yet to act on his nomination.

Horan serves in the civil division of the Butler County court, but also has presided over criminal and family law cases.

Before becoming a judge, she was with the Murrin Taylor Flach & Horan law firm, where she was named partner in 1982.

She earned a bachelor’s degree from Penn State in 1976 and a juris doctor from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law in 1979.

Baxter served as chief magistrate judge in the Western District from 2005 to 2009. She has been solicitor for Erie County Common Pleas Court and was a partner in the Cole Raywid & Braverman law firm in Washington, D.C.

After earning a bachelor’s degree from Penn State in 1978, Baxter earned a master’s degree in education in 1980 and a juris doctor in 1983, both from Temple University.

Vince Townley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at724-772-6364 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.